Focus Over Breadth: Why Flowtly Prioritizes Core

Business Functions

Flowtly’s strategy is to focus on core business processes rather than expanding into every possible feature
area. This approach recognizes a fundamental trade-off in software: breadth of scope vs. depth of
expertise and usability. In other words, an all-in-one solution that tries to “do it all” often struggles to excel
in every module – as the saying goes, “you can’t be good at everything.” Below, we explore why Flowtly
deliberately limits its scope, how this compares to broad-scope platforms like Odoo and SAP, and what it
means for ease of use and investor appeal.

Scope vs. Specialization: You Can’t Excel at Everything

In the world of ERPs and business software, attempting to cover every possible function comes with
drawbacks. No single vendor can be the best at every module or feature area, and trying to do so can
dilute quality . As Gartner analysts note, “all modules in an ERP system are rarely best-of-breed,” because
each vendor inevitably has strengths in some areas and weaknesses in others . For example, one
system might have world-class financials but mediocre project management, while another excels at supply
chain but lags in HR functionality . In practice, an overly broad scope often leads to complexity, bloat,
and subpar performance in some modules.

This is why many successful companies and products choose to concentrate on a well-defined core. A
Bain & Company study of high-growth firms found that 85% of sustained value creators focused on their
core business rather than chasing every new expansion opportunity . The authors argue that wrongly
diversifying beyond the core can destroy value, whereas a “back-to-basics” focus on core competencies is a
key source of competitive advantage . In short, focus can liberate resources and drive excellence, while
sprawling scope can lead to complexity and strategic dilution .

For software products, this means a targeted feature set can result in a better user experience and more
reliable, high-quality functionality in those areas. By not stretching to build every conceivable feature, a
focused product can optimize and innovate in its chosen domain. This philosophy underpins Flowtly’s
approach.

Flowtly’s Core Business Focus

Flowtly is designed as a streamlined platform for core operational needs – combining key functions of
HR, finance, and project operations in one place . It deliberately does not attempt to provide “edge”
features like website builders, advanced supply chain modules, or full warehouse management systems
(WMS). Instead, Flowtly concentrates on the foundational processes that virtually every small or mid-sized
business needs: managing employees and contracts, tracking time and projects, handling basic finance
(invoicing, budgets, banking), and related workflows . By covering these critical core areas and
integrating them tightly, Flowtly ensures depth and usability where it matters most, rather than shallow
coverage of everything.

Notably, Flowtly includes specialized capabilities within its focus areas that even larger suites sometimes
lack out-of-the-box. For example, it features full integration with all Polish banks for effortless financial
transaction tracking – a niche yet valuable feature for its target market that would require custom
development in broader ERPs . It also bakes in AI-powered automation (via “Flowtly agents”) for tasks
in HR, finance, and marketing, providing data-driven insights and automating repetitive work . These
built-in advantages stem from concentrating development on core use-cases. By focusing on employee
management, time tracking, projects, and finance – essentially the “heart” of many businesses – Flowtly can
deliver robust functionality (e.g. smart time tracking, contract management, resource booking, real-time
budget insights) without the distraction of peripheral modules .

Equally important, Flowtly foregoes features outside its expertise. For instance, website creation and e-
commerce are beyond Flowtly’s scope – it offers only limited capabilities there, if any, instead advising
users to integrate a dedicated solution if needed . Similarly, complex supply chain, manufacturing, or
WMS features are not part of Flowtly’s platform. This restraint is intentional: these areas are highly
specialized and attempting to build them would divert attention from Flowtly’s core mission (and likely
result in mediocre implementations). By “staying in its lane”, Flowtly devotes its resources to refining the
experience for core business processes. As a result, it can offer a unified, coherent system where all
included functions work seamlessly together, rather than a jumble of many disjointed apps.

In summary, Flowtly’s narrower scope is a strategic choice to ensure high quality, reliability, and
innovation in the essential business functions it does cover. This focus aligns with the idea that a well-
defined core product can drive sustainable growth and user satisfaction . For a growing company or an
investor evaluating Flowtly, this means the product is laser-focused on doing a few things extremely well,
instead of doing many things at an average level.

Broad-Scope Platforms: Odoo and SAP’s “All-in-One” Approach

In contrast to Flowtly’s focus, platforms like Odoo and SAP aim to offer an all-in-one suite of business
applications. Odoo, for example, markets itself as a suite of open-source apps covering “all your company
needs”, from CRM and accounting to eCommerce, inventory, point-of-sale, project management and
more . In fact, Odoo’s value proposition is explicitly to be “fully integrated” (i.e. broad in scope across
departments) while also being easy to use . SAP’s enterprise ERP systems (such as SAP S/4HANA or
SAP Business One) are even broader in reach – these are massive platforms covering virtually every
business process: financials, human resources, procurement, manufacturing, supply chain, warehouse
management, sales, analytics, and beyond. In terms of functional scope, SAP is at the very top, and
Odoo is also very expansive (especially for small and mid-size business needs). Both systems can
justifiably claim to offer “360° coverage” of business operations in one integrated solution .

The advantage of such broad scope is that a company could theoretically manage everything with one
software suite, avoiding data silos between separate tools. For instance, Odoo users have dozens of
modules at their disposal – a business can run its inventory, purchase and supplier management, quality
control, maintenance, CRM, e-commerce website, marketing, etc., all on Odoo . Similarly, an SAP
customer can implement modules for each department and process, achieving a highly integrated system
across the entire enterprise. This breadth can be appealing to larger companies with diverse needs, as it
promises comprehensive functionality under one umbrella.

However, the trade-off of broad scope is complexity. Maintaining so many features and modules
inherently makes the system more complex to implement and use. Odoo mitigates this somewhat with a
modular approach – you install only the apps you need – but as a business grows, adding more modules
can lead to a complicated setup requiring additional training and integration effort . In an Odoo vs.
Flowtly comparison, analysts noted that Odoo’s modular flexibility “can sometimes lead to a complex setup as
businesses grow, requiring additional time for software training and integration.” This suggests that while
Odoo is relatively user-friendly initially, scaling up with it isn’t trivial – employees may face a learning curve
as more apps and workflows are introduced. Some Odoo modules or configurations can even overwhelm
users; for example, Odoo’s sales and CRM tools are feature-rich but can be “overwhelming” to new users
due to their breadth .

With SAP, the complexity is even more pronounced. SAP’s enterprise ERP systems are powerful but
famously difficult to implement – a full SAP rollout can take months or years of effort and require teams of
consultants . The software itself tends to be less flexible and more standardized (to enforce best
practices at large companies), which means extensive training is required for employees to use it
effectively . Even with modern UI improvements like the SAP Fiori interface, SAP still demands
significant training and expertise, making it less user-friendly for the average employee . In side-by-
side comparisons, users consistently rate SAP’s usability lower than more streamlined systems – for
instance, on G2 Crowd Odoo scores higher in ease-of-use (8.4/10) versus SAP ECC (7.3/10) . This gap
reflects the steep learning curve and complexity inherent in SAP’s broad, enterprise-grade scope.

To illustrate, consider the features mentioned earlier that Flowtly intentionally does not tackle. Website
building: Odoo includes a website/e-commerce module out-of-the-box, and SAP offers e-commerce
solutions (like SAP Commerce Cloud) – but these add considerable surface area to the product, from content
management interfaces to SEO settings, which most core ERP users must navigate even if they aren’t
website experts. Warehouse Management: SAP and Odoo both have warehouse/inventory management
modules (SAP’s are extremely advanced; Odoo’s are suitable for SMBs). But implementing a WMS means
configuring complex workflows (receiving, put-away, picking, shipping, etc.) – features that are irrelevant to
companies not in physical goods businesses, yet they contribute to the overall complexity of the suite. By
trying to serve many industries and use-cases, broad ERPs inevitably include “extra” functionality that is
not needed in every situation, which can clutter the user experience or require turning off/hiding modules.

In summary, Odoo and SAP’s wide scope gives them an impressive functional checklist, but it comes at the
cost of higher complexity, longer implementation, and heavier training needs. This is a classic scope vs.
simplicity dilemma. For organizations that truly need those extra features, the broad platforms can be worth
it. But for many businesses – especially small and medium enterprises – a leaner system focusing on core
needs can be a smarter choice. This is where Flowtly positions itself.

Ease of Use: The Impact of Focus on User Experience

One of the clearest benefits of Flowtly’s focused approach is in ease of use and implementation. Because
Flowtly provides a unified interface for a narrower range of functions, it is inherently more streamlined and
intuitive for users. The design philosophy is to minimize complexity: Flowtly integrates the necessary
functionalities in a single user-friendly dashboard and automates many tasks, which “reduces the time and cost associated with onboarding new systems.” In practice, this means that a new customer can adopt
Flowtly and have their team up to speed quickly, without wading through a tangle of optional modules or
convoluted configuration. The interface is consistent across HR, project, and finance features, and
workflow automations (AI agents) handle repetitive operations, further simplifying the user’s job .

By only focusing on core features, Flowtly avoids the bloat that makes some larger ERPs intimidating.
Users aren’t confronted with menu options for irrelevant modules or complex multi-step processes that only
apply to certain industries. Everything in the system is there for a reason and designed for a cohesive
experience. In comparative terms, Flowtly’s UI and navigation are described as extremely
straightforward, whereas feature-dense competitors can suffer from clutter. For example, while Odoo’s
sales and CRM modules are very capable, they have been noted to be “extensive but can be overwhelming” for
users . Flowtly’s equivalent sales/project tools are streamlined for easy navigation – meaning the
most common actions are simple and accessible, and there aren’t dozens of obscure options to confuse the
average user.

It’s telling that user-friendliness has become a key differentiator even among ERPs targeting smaller
businesses. Odoo’s own marketing emphasizes an “intuitive” and modern UI for SMBs, contrasting itself
against the likes of SAP . Indeed, Odoo is generally easier to use than legacy ERPs, yet when stacked
against an even more focused tool like Flowtly, Odoo’s broader scope means more screens and
configurations to learn. With Flowtly, a small business might manage HR, time tracking, and budgets in
one integrated workflow with minimal training, whereas adopting Odoo could involve setting up and
learning multiple apps (e.g. Employees app, Timesheets app, Accounting app, etc.) and linking them
together. Each additional module adds some friction – more fields to fill, more rules to set up, and more
knowledge for the user to acquire.

Meanwhile, SAP’s ease-of-use issues are well-known. SAP has made improvements (like the Fiori UI and
role-based cockpits), but it remains a complex system requiring extensive training . Typical SAP users
must memorize transaction codes or navigate deep menu trees for various operations, and the software
often assumes an IT-trained operator or specialist for certain tasks. The difference is evident in user
feedback: as mentioned, reviewers rate Odoo significantly higher in usability than SAP , citing Odoo’s
simpler, more modern interface. If we extrapolate this trend, a product like Flowtly – which is even more
tailored and simplified for core tasks – would occupy an even stronger position on the ease-of-use
spectrum for its target users.

The chart below provides a visual comparison of how Flowtly, Odoo, and SAP position themselves on the
axes of Ease of Use (horizontal) and Functional Scope (vertical):

Illustrative positioning of Flowtly vs. broad-scope ERPs on “Ease of Use” (X-axis) and “Scope of Features” (Y-axis).
Flowtly (green) focuses on core functions, trading some breadth for a simpler, more user-friendly experience. Odoo
(blue) offers a wide suite of apps, achieving high scope with moderate ease-of-use for an ERP. SAP (red) provides
the deepest scope but with significantly lower ease of use due to its complexity. Smaller single-purpose tools (gray)
are very easy to use but cover only one domain.

As the diagram suggests, Flowtly is well-positioned for users who value simplicity and usability over
having every conceivable feature. Its point on the chart is to the right (high ease) of broader suites like
Odoo and SAP, though lower on the scope axis since it purposefully omits non-core modules. This
positioning is a sweet spot for many small and medium businesses: they get a software that covers their most important needs without the headache. In contrast, SAP sits at the top-left – extremely
comprehensive but notoriously difficult to use – and Odoo tries to balance near the top-right, offering both
breadth and reasonable usability. It’s worth noting that even Odoo, with its emphasis on being user-
friendly, doesn’t match Flowtly’s simplicity in areas outside of its focus. By not venturing into eCommerce,
warehouse management, and other peripheral functions, Flowtly keeps its UI uncluttered and its learning
curve shallow.

From an investor’s perspective, this focus on ease-of-use and rapid onboarding can be very attractive. It
suggests lower customer churn (because frustrated users are less likely to abandon the product), and
potentially faster sales cycles (since prospects can see value quickly without complex demos or POCs).
Moreover, it targets a segment of the market – businesses that find large ERPs too much to handle – which
is quite substantial. There are countless SMEs that need more than basic spreadsheets, but also dread the
complexity of implementing a giant system; Flowtly is built for them. In software, products that delight
users with simplicity can often outpace feature-overloaded competitors, especially in underserved SMB
markets.

Comparative Summary

To crystallize the differences, the table below compares Flowtly, Odoo, and SAP on their scope and ease of
use, along with a few example features:

Conclusion

In conclusion, Flowtly does not “reach for scope” because it wisely acknowledges that trying to be
good at everything often means being great at nothing. By concentrating on core business processes,
Flowtly can provide a superior, user-friendly experience in those areas – an approach that yields intuitive
software and satisfied customers. Meanwhile, giants like Odoo and SAP demonstrate the opposite end of
the spectrum: broad scope can empower a one-stop solution, but it introduces complexity and diminishes
ease of use. There is no one-size-fits-all answer; each strategy has its audience. Yet for many organizations
(and the investors backing solutions for them), a focused product that nails the fundamentals and is actually
adopted by its users can be far more valuable than an overloaded suite that looks good on paper but proves
cumbersome in practice.

Flowtly’s positioning – high ease-of-use, essential scope, and the agility to innovate within that scope –
gives it a competitive edge in the SMB market. It’s a classic case of depth over breadth. As market trends and
case studies have shown, doubling down on one’s core strengths can drive both customer success and
profitable growth . In a landscape where software is often judged by how quickly it delivers value to
users, Flowtly’s “less is more” philosophy may indeed be its greatest strength.

References

Best-of-Breed vs All-In-One ERP Solutions: What’s the Difference and Why does it Matter? | BT
Partners
https://www.btpartners.com/technology-blogs/best-of-breed-vs-all-in-one-erp-solutions-whats-the-difference-and-why-does-it-matter

A strong core business is key to profitable growth | Bain & Company
https://www.bain.com/insights/a-strong-core-business-is-key/

Flowtly : the AI ERP that gives small businesses big-company power.
https://flowtly.com/

Odoo vs Flowtly: In-Depth Comparison for Business Efficiency - Central Europe Technology
https://central-europe.technology/2025/07/14/odoo-vs-flowtly-comparison/

About Us | Odoo
https://www.odoo.com/page/about-us

Netsuite vs Odoo, 2024 Comparison Whitepaper
https://www.odoo.com/page/odoo-vs-netsuite-mrp

Odoo vs SAP: Everything You Need to Know! - Abbacus Technologies
https://www.abbacustechnologies.com/odoo-vs-sap-everything-you-need-to-know/

Compare Odoo ERP vs. SAP ECC | G2
https://www.g2.com/compare/odoo-odoo-erp-vs-sap-ecc

Odoo vs SAP: A Comprehensive Comparison for Businesses
https://fairchanceforcrm.com/odoo-vs-sap/